The line graph represents average carbon dioxide released by each person in four European countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, Italy and Portugal witnessed a substantial peak in the middling amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person, the opposite was true for the UK and Sweden. Besides, it is noticeable that residents in the UK produced the biggest quantity of carbon dioxide while the Portuguese produced the smallest.
In the starting year, Portugal began at below two tonnes but later went up considerably to nearly six tonnes. On the contrary, Italy had a steady growth over the period of 30 years from 1997 to 1997 before stabilizing between 1997 to 2007. There was a downward fluctuation in the majority of Swedish’s emissions during the first 20 years, followed by a significant decrease by about four tonnes. The UK, even though going down most of the time, still had the largest amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person.
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 67
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in 59
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 67
- The pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 78
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group
The line graph represents
The line graph represents average carbon dioxide released by each person in four European countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, Italy and Portugal witnessed a substantial peak in the middling amount of CO2 emissions per person, the opposite was true for the UK and Sweden. Besides, it is noticeable that residents in the UK produced the biggest quantity of CO2 while the Portuguese produced the smallest.
In the starting year, Portugal began at below two tonnes but later went up considerably to nearly six tonnes. On the contrary, Italy had a steady growth over the period of 30 years from 1997 to 1997 before stablising between 1997 to 2007.
There was a downward fluctuation in the majority of Swedish’s emissions during the first 20 years, followed by a significant decrease by about four tonnes. The UK, even though going down most of the time, still had the largest amount of CO2 emissions per person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph represents average carbon...
^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teady growth over the period of 30 years from 1997 to 1997 before stabilizing bet...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, so, still, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 937.175257732 85% => OK
No of words: 157.0 206.0 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06369426752 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68268580265 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 127.690721649 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.622605031667 104% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 290.88556701 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.0906110674 44.8134815571 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 76.5299724578 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 16.8248392259 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 4.34317383033 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253347574191 0.216113520407 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107286819292 0.0766984524023 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733240170155 0.0603063233224 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175367141602 0.12726935374 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305199660681 0.0580467560999 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 8.37731958763 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 70.7449484536 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 41.2886597938 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.