The line graph compares the figure for the amount of CO2 emitted by each person in 4 different countries in the period from 1967 to 2007.
It is clear that the resident of UK was responsible for the most CO2 in whole period while the figure for Portugal was lowest. It is also noticeable that the main trend of UK and Sweden was decrease while it is opposite trend belonged to Portugal and Italy.
In 1967, most amount of CO2 released by UK people with about 11.3 tons while it was just 1 ton average for each Portugal inhabitants. In the same year, each Italian emitted about 4 tons CO2 which was doubled by Swedish with about 8 tons.
In 2007, after a gradual decrease, the figure of UK was more than 8 tons while the amount of CO2 of each Italian rose to near 8 tons. Additionally, the average CO2 emissions per Sweden person reach a peak in 1997 at more than 10 tons then decreased significantly to 5.5 in 2007 which was identical with the amount of CO2 Portugal people emitted in the same year.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...doubled by Swedish with about 8 tons. In 2007, after a gradual decrease, the fig...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 937.175257732 87% => OK
No of words: 187.0 206.0 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3743315508 4.54256449028 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36218408211 2.54303337028 93% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 127.690721649 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475935828877 0.622605031667 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 290.88556701 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.8427435881 44.8134815571 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 76.5299724578 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 16.8248392259 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 4.34317383033 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15474163743 0.216113520407 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854567416273 0.0766984524023 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514977472841 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108068661221 0.12726935374 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359421528829 0.0580467560999 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 8.37731958763 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 70.7449484536 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 8.71597938144 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 7.59969072165 95% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 41.2886597938 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.