The given line graph compares the amount of carbon dioxide, which was emitted on the midpoint by per capita in four varied European nations, measured statistically in metric tonnes. This comparison commenced in 1967 and sustained until 2007.
Taking a glance from an overall perspective, it is apparent from the data provided that while obviously, co2 production by people saw a considerable drop in UK alongside Sweden, this gas production witnessed an exponential growth in another two nations that are Italy as well as Portugal in the period of 40 years. It is also worthy to note that British people emitted the most co2 in quantity in metric tonnes, though quite the opposite Portuguese residents produced the least amount of co2.
As is illustrated by the figure, it is palpable that CO2 production in UK was recorded as the highest amount among other three nations that was more than 10 metric tonnes in 1967.Conversely, in the same year the amount of this gas production was the least in quantity in Portugal at 2 metric tonnes.Moreover, the amount of CO2 emission in metric tonnes was measured around 7 in both Italy and Sweden in 1987.
As is shown by this diagram, the sharp drop in CO2 emission in 1977 from almost 11 to around 7 metric tonnes in 1987 was the most noticeable conversion in the entire figure. Furthermore, in 2007 both Swiss and Portuguese residents produced same amount of CO2 that was around 5 metric tonnes on the midpoint.
- some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given line graph compares the amount...
^^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he midpoint by per capita in four varied European nations, measured statistically...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nced in 1967 and sustained until 2007. Taking a glance from an overall perspect...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts produced the least amount of co2. As is illustrated by the figure, it is p...
^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Conversely
... was more than 10 metric tonnes in 1967.Conversely, in the same year the amount of this ga...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...quantity in Portugal at 2 metric tonnes.Moreover, the amount of CO2 emission in metric t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 7 in both Italy and Sweden in 1987. As is shown by this diagram, the sharp d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 32.9175257732 39% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 937.175257732 130% => OK
No of words: 249.0 206.0 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87951807229 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.78020617076 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79910747583 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 127.690721649 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 290.88556701 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 16.3608247423 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.172952974 44.8134815571 241% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.571428571 76.5299724578 227% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 35.5714285714 16.8248392259 211% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 4.34317383033 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 2.54639175258 275% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12395295285 0.216113520407 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679389831359 0.0766984524023 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268111601648 0.0603063233224 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844105113585 0.12726935374 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227849314889 0.0580467560999 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 8.37731958763 230% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 70.7449484536 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 7.45979381443 212% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 41.2886597938 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 8.54432989691 187% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 8.15463917526 196% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.