The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given map illustrates the amount of food and various types of meat utilized in a European nation from 1979 to 2004
Overall, clearly that the highest figures for Chicken throughout the period. In addition, the opposite was true with the fish.
Looking at the map more closely, we can see that the amount of chicken consumed by citizens in a European nation was the highest at roughly 218 grams per person per week, after which it experienced a slight decrease to 196 grams per one per week in 1989. It followed by lamb was 150 grams in 1979 and in 1989 this amount of consumption dropped to 100 grams. Meanwhile, standing at 140 grams in 1979, the number of beef took over the dominance of Lamb and Chicken, reaching about 200 grams in 1989, while the lowest figure for fish was approximately 60 grams in 1979 and a final decrease to 50 grams in 1989.
In the second half of the period, chicken stood in the leading position, at 250 grams in 2004, while the amount of beef decreased by about 50 grams and 70 grams for lamb at the end of the stage. There was no change for fish compared to 1989.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-22 | jadenguyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | Nguyenmay | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | ann_01 | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-21 | RoseNguyen | 73 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems 61
- The graph below shows the population of Chile by age group between 1975 and 2035 85
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants Write a report for a university lecturer des 78
- when choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 937.175257732 97% => OK
No of words: 204.0 206.0 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44117647059 4.54256449028 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30481834862 2.54303337028 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 290.88556701 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.41237113402 85% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.7440114363 44.8134815571 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 76.5299724578 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 16.8248392259 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 4.34317383033 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107024380498 0.216113520407 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063801972427 0.0766984524023 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362411138167 0.0603063233224 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826456176694 0.12726935374 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550616905322 0.0580467560999 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 8.37731958763 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 70.7449484536 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 8.71597938144 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.