The line chart shows the percentage of UK adolescents following the vegetarian diet from 1960 and the expectation until 2020. As you can observe, a vegetarian diet following by teenagers in the UK has risen from 1960 until 1980, and after that it dropped significantly until 1991.
There was a rise in the percentage of adolescents following a vegetarian diet in the UK from 1961 until 1980, when it reached a peak of 15% the highest proportion of young vegetarian in the UK. However, over the following ten years, the line chart shows that it decreased sharply from 16% to around 7% in 1991. The lowest proportion of young vegetarian in the UK was in 1997 around 5%. Since then, the vegetarian diet has fluctuated moderately until 2000. Between 2001 it starts gradually rose again until reaching a peak of 10% in 2010. It is also projected to remain the same 10% until 2020.
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation. To what degree do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 725.0 937.175257732 77% => OK
No of words: 154.0 206.0 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70779220779 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70090063251 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 127.690721649 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506493506494 0.622605031667 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.9 290.88556701 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5924250854 44.8134815571 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.625 76.5299724578 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 4.34317383033 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.29896907216 47% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269505991939 0.216113520407 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130318638664 0.0766984524023 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11316144052 0.0603063233224 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243015687593 0.12726935374 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260716137131 0.0580467560999 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 8.37731958763 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 8.71597938144 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 7.59969072165 90% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 41.2886597938 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.