Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation. To what degree do you agree or disagree?

The consumption of Convenience foods is increasing over the years in many parts of the world, mainly in the big cities where people are always busy and don´t have time to cook their own food. As a result Convenience foods has eventually replacing traditional food and traditional methods of preparation. I completely disagree with this opinion.
In my point of view, people prefer convenience foods instead of the traditional ones, because it is a way to save time. Also, this kind of food is already prepared or it´s ready to eat. However, Convenience food wouldn’t replace traditional food.
Government needs to start alerting people of how dangerous is eating Convenience foods regularly, and the impact that this kind of food brings to their health. Governments must show the importance of the consumption of traditional food daily. In order to inform people that the lack of vitamins and nutrients can mess with their health, government can start programs to encourage people to feed themselves better.
By the time that people starting to know the importance of a good nutrition, products pre-prepared or ready for consumption will be less consumed by the population. Even if, people´s live remain occupied or busy, they will know that have a good nutrition provide a healthy life and decrease the chances of diseases such as hypertension or diabetes.
To conclude, if the health system starts to raise awareness the risks either eating Convenience foods regularly or replace totally the consumption of traditional food for Convenience food. In order to avoid that more people replace the good nutrition for the bad one, society needs to take action now.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, kind of, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22509225092 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93433813204 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546125461255 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8875079124 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400021292833 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183013745153 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181071495151 0.0667982634062 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252322556497 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146589235234 0.056905535591 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.