This given line graph below demonstrate 3 different kinds of fast food: Pizza, Fish and chips, Hamburgers in terms of the amount of the times per year for eating of teenagers who lived in Australia between 1975 and 2000.
In general, one of the most notable features of the graph is that the amount of times spent on Fish and Chips selled for Australian teenagers decreased while that on Pizza and Hamburgers increased. As can be seen from the line graph, at the beginning of the period, the Fish and Chips was the best seller in the restaurants, however, at the end, hamburgers became the king of fast food.
In the first year of the period, the figure for Fish and Chips was the highest at 100 times while that for hamburgers and pizza was significantly lower at 10 and 5 respectively. Between 1975 and 1985, there was a huge growth of the consumption of Hamburgers from around 10 to nearly 85 times. By contrast during the same period, the that of Fish and Chips declined slightly from about 100 to more 95 times. This part of the period also witnessed a significant rise of the figure for pizza of nearly 28 times but Pizza just was the least popular fast food.
From 1985 to 2000, the amount of times using for eating Fish and Chips plunged by approximately 50 times while that of Pizza rocketed from nearly 33 to over 85 time. In about 15 last years of the period, the Hamburgers which the figure for went up remarkably from 85 to more 100 times, was the most favorite choice
- The illustrations shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 67
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 26.3917525773 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 937.175257732 130% => OK
No of words: 271.0 206.0 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49815498155 4.54256449028 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40023214792 2.54303337028 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 127.690721649 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468634686347 0.622605031667 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 290.88556701 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 16.3608247423 183% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.286375655 44.8134815571 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.444444444 76.5299724578 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 16.8248392259 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 4.34317383033 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147683828887 0.216113520407 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753748418777 0.0766984524023 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609140820356 0.0603063233224 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122123426901 0.12726935374 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651896851475 0.0580467560999 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 8.37731958763 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 70.7449484536 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 8.71597938144 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 7.59969072165 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 41.2886597938 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 8.62886597938 197% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 8.54432989691 164% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.