The line chart compares the percentage of visitors to four different attractions over the period of thirty years from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, the number of tourists to castle and zoo increased significantly whereas the proportion to festival and aquarium decreased moderately.
After increasing to reach the peak to nearly 45% in 1995, the number of people visiting castle went down approximately 34%. At the same time, aquarium’s visitors gradually fluctuated around 10% to 15%. During the next period from 2000 to 2010, while the tourists to castle still decreased slightly around 33%, the figure of zoo leaped with over 20%.
As can be seen from the graph, in 1980, the festival was the most attractive place to visitors compared to 20% for Aquarium. There was a growth in a number of tourists to aquarium before decreasing back to approximate 20%. This figure continued to decrease to 10% in the final year 2010. On the contrary, despite starting at the highest point, the number of travelers to festival reduced steadily over the period.
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table shows the percentages of adults in urban and rural a areas who took part in 4 fee time activities in 1990 and 2010 73
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 937.175257732 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 206.0 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09826589595 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75462486877 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5055316845 44.8134815571 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 76.5299724578 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 4.34317383033 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849411475975 0.216113520407 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367186058578 0.0766984524023 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463656381853 0.0603063233224 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654938015015 0.12726935374 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535478090505 0.0580467560999 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 8.37731958763 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 8.71597938144 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.