The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant.

The table illustrates the percentage of visitors to four popular places in Scotland: Aquarium, Castle, Zoo, Festival between 1980 to 2010.
Generally, there was a significant increased in the number of Castle and Zoo tourists, while which in Aquarium and Festival reduced. This made Castle have the highest scale of people, on the other hand, that of Aquarium is the lowest although having a good beginning.
From 1980 to 1995, we can see a strong fluctuation in Castle and Aquarium ‘s number of visitors from around 20%,but while Castle after the fluctuation achieved the best rate of visitors with over 40% in 1995, this rate of Aquarium increased slightly with over 20%( compare with about 20% before), what a sad story! Meanwhile, Zoo started the lowest level: 10% like Aquarium, this number just went up a little bit after a small oscillation, when Festival fell steady from around 30% to over 20%.
Next 5 years, Aquarium and Festival percentage of people all declined rapidly with respectively under 10% and 20%, while that in Zoo grew considerably to around 20%. In the same period, although having the highest number of visitors in 1995, Castle couldn’t keep it and went down gradually to over 30% in 2010.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS General Training

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Castle) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... and Festival reduced. This made Castle have the highest scale of people, on the oth...
^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ke Aquarium, this number just went up a little bit after a small oscillation, when Festiva...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 26.3917525773 182% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 937.175257732 109% => OK
No of words: 205.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98536585366 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59887863065 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 127.690721649 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541463414634 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 290.88556701 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 16.3608247423 208% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.175073293 44.8134815571 295% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.333333333 76.5299724578 223% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 34.1666666667 16.8248392259 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.5 4.34317383033 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0224514345988 0.216113520407 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0186757549539 0.0766984524023 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325720210056 0.0603063233224 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0265053992944 0.12726935374 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03676592228 0.0580467560999 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 8.37731958763 229% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 70.7449484536 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 7.45979381443 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 8.71597938144 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 7.59969072165 110% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 8.54432989691 183% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.