These days, there is some discussion about whether pop stars should be paid better than classical musicians. Although both views are reasonable, I think it is fair that pop singers earn more money than classical musicians.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why classical musicians should earn better salaries than pop stars. Firstly, because classical music is generally listened to by society's more influential and wealthy classes, classical music composers are put under a lot of pressure. Some spend their entire lives learning to master a particular musical instrument or style of music. In addition, classical music tends to be performed live on stage, and therefore musicians need to give a perfect performance every time, which could be very stressful. Pop stars, however, usually only sing along with music that is played from a recording, or can retake a recording when in the studio.
On the other hand, most pop stars need to spend countless hours in the studio every year in order to record new music, followed by many weeks and months touring the world performing and promoting their music to their fans. Although this may sound like an amazing lifestyle to some, many pop stars become exhausted and burnout early in their career or turn to drugs and alcohol in order to cope with the stress. Furthermore, pop stars are generally also expected to act as role models for the youth. This responsibility requires them to monitor their actions and behaviour in order to set positive examples for young people to follow, which can also add to their stress. Lastly, most pop stars have short-lived careers as pop music continues to evolve and new stars replace the old.
In conclusion, while both pop stars and classical musicians both have certain stresses in their careers, I believe that pop stars are more worthy of a higher income because of their duty to be role models, and the uncertainty of their career span.
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 56
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 56
- Healthcare should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that Do you agree with this opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quires them to monitor their actions and behaviour in order to set positive examp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98461538462 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50175985396 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566153846154 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0354898385 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375273339028 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137254636196 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788786368575 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242047563321 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759023736414 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.