You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the number of films produced by five countries in three years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The graph represents how many films created by five countries in three distinguished years.
what stands out from the chart is that the number of films produced in five countries witnessed a prominent downward trend. In adition, the figure for country A was the highest whereas those for country E was all time low.
Standing at the highest point at about 90 films country A experienced a stability in its film production in the first two years, it then dropped considerably to about 80 filems produced in 2009. Country B, in contrast, released the same number of films in 2007 and 2008 at 50 films becoming the second highest country of all. However, the year 2009 saw a significant surge by 20 film products.
Refering to the other 3 countries which had the number of films produced of fewer than 20. While country C experienced a rise in this field, country D witnessed a fluctuation in film production. This number in country E relatively stablized over the 3 years mentioned.
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 78
- The diagram below shows how Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 11
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...untries in three distinguished years. what stands out from the chart is that the n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...highest point at about 90 films country A experienced a stability in its film pro...
^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun saw seems to be countable, so consider using: '2009 saws', '2009 sees'.
Suggestion: 2009 saws; 2009 sees
...ghest country of all. However, the year 2009 saw a significant surge by 20 film products...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78823529412 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7713062639 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1293970796 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237328419184 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115463883881 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331129150628 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155325376341 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033461609949 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.