Nowadays most children are appearing in reality shows on TV. Some people feel it is good trend others do not agree.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
These days, the reality shows are becoming increasingly popular because some people think that these shows are giving fairly good platform for the children to showcase their talent and become famous overnight. On the other hand it is also creating competitive mentality at a very young age and stresses the children to run towards success which is actually no necessary at this age.
These shows are promoted in a way that they are bringing out the talent within the children. Of course, it is a place where the talented children become popular overnight. They get a lot of exposure and become a star. They are getting a stage to show their skills. The best of the best are identified or even child prodigies are found and their talents are promoted. They get an opportunity to be judged by the experts in the industry. All these will help the children to overcome the stage fear by also giving the more confidence to handle the future.
Contrariwise, the fact is these shows are scripted and are not a reality. The show is directed based on the response of the audience in the previous episode. The television channels involve children in the emotional drama and make them react vivid to get more viewership. Without giving any psychological counselling on how to handle the failure, the parents, friends, teachers and even neighbours are pushing the children towards fierce competition which will lead them to mental stress. As we all know, winner takes everything. The children who are losing the contest may lose the confidence and may suffer inferiority complex. On the other, the sudden success for the winner may be transitory. In my opinion, both will lead to psychological consequences and make the children change their attitude and create envy like adults at a very early age, when there is a lot of time to concern about their future. Since the shows are scripted, there is a chance that the deserving candidates might not win. I know a winner who got an opportunity towards their career path after a reality show who was unable to shine. Viewers have moved ahead to watch the next show.
Even though one becomes popular by winning the show, the rest of the children are facing the failure. These shows may be a pathway to fame and bring accolades for the youngsters yet we may have to consider the pitfalls.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-14 | Thilagavathi | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, so, of course, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 7.48453608247 334% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 32.9175257732 85% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 937.175257732 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 401.0 206.0 195% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80548628429 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 3.78020617076 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56520370014 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 127.690721649 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518703241895 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 290.88556701 211% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 9.0 0.824742268041 1091% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 12.6804123711 173% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9156181217 44.8134815571 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5909090909 76.5299724578 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2272727273 16.8248392259 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 4.34317383033 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 7.41237113402 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167946748032 0.216113520407 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456085478509 0.0766984524023 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382627969519 0.0603063233224 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107048884583 0.12726935374 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434445797286 0.0580467560999 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 8.37731958763 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 8.71597938144 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 41.2886597938 213% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.