The pie chart illustrated the percentage of people speaking a variety of languages on the internet in the year 2001, while, the table depicted the average number of online users in million compared to the overall world population on the yearly basis from November 1997 to August 2001.
In general, it is noticeable that the population of online users showed an upward trend from 1997 to 2001. Moreover, it is clear that English was the dominating language in 2001.
It is clearly seen from the pie chart that online users were 529 million in total in December 2011, and 43% of them preferred to use English which accounted for more than one fourth. On the other hand, every other language was shared less than 9% in decreasing order, Japanese, Chinese, German, Spanish, Korean, Italian, French, Portuguese, and Dutch. The lowest proportion related to Dutch speakers which is 2.1%. the other unlisted languages altogether accounted for less than 10%.
Moreover, the number of online users was 76 million in 1997 and accounted for 1,8% of the world population. These figures were doubled in 1998 and reached 147 million and 3,6%, respectively. This upward trend continued and the online user numbers rose to 513 million and the rate reached 8,4% in August 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...d the average number of online users in million compared to the overall world populatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...elated to Dutch speakers which is 2.1%. the other unlisted languages altogether acc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 32.9175257732 27% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 26.3917525773 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 937.175257732 112% => OK
No of words: 211.0 206.0 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99526066351 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46743348993 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 127.690721649 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545023696682 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 290.88556701 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6582820366 44.8134815571 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 76.5299724578 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 16.8248392259 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 4.34317383033 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236882471317 0.216113520407 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799480655025 0.0766984524023 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737769389255 0.0603063233224 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142174955208 0.12726935374 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763953959314 0.0580467560999 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 8.37731958763 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 8.71597938144 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 7.59969072165 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.