Some people believe that it would be beneficial if employees worked three or four days per week rather than five or six days.
Why is this? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experiences.
A balanced professional and personal life is key to happiness according to researchers. That is why most of them suggest that employers should reduce the workweek to four days. It is agreed that this method would affect people's productivity and speeding up projects at work. Expanding these results in an ongoing issue.
Firstly, one key result of reducing workdays is increased creativity, intelligence, and enthusiasm of employees in relation to specified work. This pattern of work allows employees to allocate more quality time to their friends and families, which leads to their mental health. Take Microsoft as an example, this successful company provided facilities and recreational equipment for their workers to help them think more creative in the work hours. It is undeniable that overwork causes stress and hamper productivity in the long run. Besides, proper vacation refreshes people's mind and help them to take part in social activities. Thus, the link between fewer workdays and more innovation and productivity at work hours is clear.
On the other hand, time management strategies have revealed that more hours of work would not necessarily lead to a growth in productivity. In contrast, optimizing work conditions and less time for a project will increase focus and efficiency for most of the people. In this situation, great ideas happen, bearing in mind the example of the best architectural buildings created in time-intensive conditions. So, it is obvious that optimizing time is a better solution to get sophisticated results specially in a team-work situation.
To conclude, it is agreed that a balanced work week which considers 3 days off for employers might have better results in improving creative decisions and speeding up projects. Companies should not put extra pressure on workers and they should engage their employees with relaxing activities to get better results and more profit.
- Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem. Do you agree? 61
- how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children? 61
- the graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland between 1960 and 1995. 61
- Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem Do you agree 79
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, so, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38079470199 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.944222573 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3633502987 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137636046885 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043570846038 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318288768808 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850169688218 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153137703047 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.