Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
All medical records show that smoking is injurious to health. To make it worse, it is not only harmful to the smoker but also to the people present nearby, commonly known as passive smoking.
While a person can enjoy their preferences indoor at their leisure, it certainly makes sense to get it banned in public places. Smoking is a personal choice and one should not be refrained from it. However, if one's actions are causing detrimental effects on others health, it should not be neglected.
It's agreeable that one would urge to smoke while enjoying their outings, it can be accommodated in such manner so as to cause no harm to the nearby public. For example, smoking rooms can be facilitated in restaurants to avoid smoke congestion caused to other public. If it's an open area, one can find a secluded area to smoke to avoid passive smoking.
Another point to highlight the damage caused by smoking is the adverse effect it creates in environment. Environment pollution is a serious matter and should be dealt in a stringent manner. The harmful ingredients released in air due to smoking pollutes the environment and endangers other species around us apart from humans including our mother nature.
To conclude, I strongly agree with the idea of getting smoking practices banned in public areas in everyone's interest. Not only will this save the environment and nearby people but might also act as a driving force in curtailing one's smoking habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-03 | Shivangi Mishra | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Shivangi Mishra | 82 | view |
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d not be refrained from it. However, if ones actions are causing detrimental effects...
^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ions are causing detrimental effects on others health, it should not be neglected. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'smoking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: smoking
...d. Its agreeable that one would urge to smoke while enjoying their outings, it can be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
..., it can be accommodated in such manner so as to cause no harm to the nearby public. For...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a stringent manner" with adverb for "stringent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...is a serious matter and should be dealt in a stringent manner. The harmful ingredients released in ai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...so act as a driving force in curtailing ones smoking habits.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, apart from, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 4.92783505155 203% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 32.9175257732 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 937.175257732 130% => OK
No of words: 246.0 206.0 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97154471545 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.78020617076 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63654475274 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 127.690721649 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 290.88556701 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8060793608 44.8134815571 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0769230769 76.5299724578 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 16.8248392259 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 4.34317383033 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312847162753 0.216113520407 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112401384557 0.0766984524023 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481740319676 0.0603063233224 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17319303216 0.12726935374 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388028168093 0.0580467560999 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 8.37731958763 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 41.2886597938 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.