While there are people who think the eradication of poverty very much depends on the development in economy, others believe that it should be ceased due to deleterious effects on environment. In my opinion, economic growth is necessary to alleviate poverty and raise living standards, but the preservation of environment is also needed to be taken into account.
On one hand, a booming economy increases living standards and lift people out of extreme poverty. People drive benefit from higher living standards, as it opens up ample employment opportunities for young people, so they can stand on their own feet without living off their parents in late 20s and early 30s. This encourages early marriage and enables the youth to get a job to save money to start a family. Therefore, if young people can afford a family life, they will less likely get caught up in dishonest relationship and have happier life.
On the other hand, although the development of economy makes people more affluent, the irreparable damage it causes on environment is irrefutable. Economic growth increases productivity which leads to the more consumption of non renewable resources. The pollution they impose on environment can maintain for years. For example, the use of plastic which when deposed of do not degrade. And so many toxic waste emitted from factories jeopardize our health and causes environmental destruction, as these pollutants sustain on environment for long.
In conclusion, however economic advancement has a detrimental impact on environment, it is a must for every country to boost its economy. Since it enhances people 's living conditions and disentangles them from poverty besetting many underpriveldge society. I am of the opinion that the merits of economic progress outweight its drawbacks. Because it provides welfare benefits and services for people so that they can be better off and apply environment friendly methods to mitigate its harmful effects.
In the recent years, rapidly
In the recent years, rapidly booming uplift of economy is gaining a great deal of attention throughout the globe. Most importantly, it has been a bone of contention among the critics regarding its impact in the world. While some people feel that it has several downsides on environment, I would contend that it has multifarious benefits too. Here, both sides of my assertion will be scrutinized with my proper verdict at last.
To commence with, poverty has been a significant issue amongst many nation caused by illiteracy, lack of infrastructure and economic progress. Apparently, if a nation encourages on economic growth it can enable high standard of living with adequate job opportunities for people to attain their basic need and improve incentives for parents to invest in their children’s education by sending them to school. Consequently, this will lead to growth in entrepreneurs with pressure on good governance. Additionally, economic growth during the Twentieth Century was a major factor in reducing absolute levels of poverty and enabling a rise in life expectancy.
Nevertheless, despite of its many benefits commercial development can have irreversible impact on environment. For instance, future growth cannot be done without environmental sustainability however, the rate of economic growth is increasing on increase in quantity and quality of natural resources like fossil fuels, valuable metal and wildlife. To illustrate, excessive use of fossil fuels in industries and automobiles releases more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, making them the primary contributor to global warming and climate change.
To conclude, as I aforementioned economic growth has a deleterious influence on environment ,however it is required for to eradicate poverty and improve nation’s economy. In my opinion, future economic growth scheme with emphasis on sustainable nature can transfer the world into a happier place.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 32.9175257732 73% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.85567010309 415% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 937.175257732 176% => OK
No of words: 312.0 206.0 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28525641026 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97150995017 2.54303337028 117% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 127.690721649 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 290.88556701 182% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 1.83505154639 381% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8138087797 44.8134815571 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 76.5299724578 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 4.34317383033 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178155416932 0.216113520407 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593991161313 0.0766984524023 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556512068186 0.0603063233224 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120573913044 0.12726935374 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790202088302 0.0580467560999 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 8.37731958763 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 70.7449484536 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 7.45979381443 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 8.71597938144 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 7.59969072165 125% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 41.2886597938 233% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 8.62886597938 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.