Some people think playing computer games is bad for children on everything. Others think it has some positive on the way children develop. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Opinions are divided as to the effectiveness of computer games on physical development of a child. While there are people who think their impact is negative, others believe they have a positive influence. I personally think the downsides of computer games outweigh their benefits as they hamper the physical well-being of children.
On the one hand, children can reap the benefits of computer games, helping them achieve complete mastery of computer skills and thereby fulfilling a requirement of modern job market. They also work best for quick decision making, since they create a situation for children to find a perfect solution to the problem besetting the character in a game. For this reason, children use all their brain power to come up with the creative ways to solve the puzzle and win the game.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that the irreparable damage they cause to the physical health of children is far greater than any benefits. Computer games are highly addictive for both children and adult alike which jeopardize their health. One of the most common issues that is faced by these addicted gamers is obesity. They tend to sit in one place for long hours and hence their body miss out on any kind of physical activity. Excessive gaming can also lead to another ailment called insomnia. It not only hinders the children of having a normal sleep but also damages their immune system. Therefore, trying not to get into such troubles as far as possible is the advisable thing to do.
In conclusion, playing computer games can help the children to some extent, but they put their health at risk. In my opinion, parents should be very selective about the sort of hobbies their children can have and consider all aspects including the health.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90301003344 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47860612601 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6234478065 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294354869876 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973570948537 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659862500711 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184828877719 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500426016402 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.