Some people say that the only way to learn a new language is moving to the country where the language is spoken.
What do you think about that?
It is argued by some that to learn a new language it is necessary to live in the region where that new language is spoken. As far as I am concerned, living abroad is a great way to learn a new language, however people also can learn it on their own country by taking classes, studying online and watching TV. The following paragraphs will discuss these ideas.
Living abroad is a excellent way to learn a new language. Individuals who live abroad have the opportunity to interact with native speakers on the daily basis, which helps them to develop the ability to speak a second language.For example, when I used to leave in France I did not speak any French, however I start doing thing like talk to locals, go to the grocery by myself, drive around the city, and all these things helped me to become a French speaker. Besides, people also can take language classes when they are living abroad, this helps them even more with the challenge of learning a new language. Some countries, such as Canada, USA, Australia and South Africa have become the main destinations for pupils who want to learn how to speak english because it is easy to find school specialized on teaching english to foreigners. This all clearly show that another language other than our own can be learned when we decide to live overseas.
At their own country people can learn a new language at schools, online or/ and watching TV. In many countries it is possible to find second language schools for locals. These schools have teachers who are dedicate their time teaching a new language to whoever wants to stand out from rest of the population and learn something new. For example, in Brazil if you have english as your second language you are considered a more qualified worker than the others who do not speak english. Additionally, another way to learn is online. Nowadays there are a variety of resources available online, such as classes on YouTube, chats with native speakers, and games that challenge students by asking them question related to the language. Moreover, another helpful tool is the television. People can watch movies and TV shows presented by artists who speak the language that the they want to learn. This is also a fun way to learn. For example, the TV show the “Big Bang Theory” is watched by many Brazilians who wants to speak english, and according to them the reason they prefer learning english like that is because they easily learn when they are having fun. Learning a new language might be challenge, but it is possible be done on our own country on different ways
In conclusion, dealing with native speakers personally on the daily basis is likely to be very helpful when it comes to learning a new language, however it does not mean that this is the only way to learn a new language. This essay showed that classes, internet and television are great tools to help people on this learning journey, even when they decide not to move abroad.
- Some people say that the only way to learn a new language is moving to the country where the language is spoken.What do you think about that? 78
- Many people nowadays work long hours and working has become more stressful.What are the reasons for this?What could companies do to help employees to improve their lives? 73
- Many people nowadays work long hours and working has become more stressful.What are the reasons for this?What could companies do to help employees to improve their lives? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...iscuss these ideas. Living abroad is a excellent way to learn a new language. ...
^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... the ability to speak a second language.For example, when I used to leave in France...
^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...for locals. These schools have teachers who are dedicate their time teaching a new lang...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dedicated'.
Suggestion: dedicated
...ls. These schools have teachers who are dedicate their time teaching a new language to w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 867, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
... by artists who speak the language that the they want to learn. This is also a fun way t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1111, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
... they prefer learning english like that is because they easily learn when they are having ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 7.48453608247 334% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 22.0 3.03092783505 726% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 32.9175257732 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 26.3917525773 239% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2454.0 937.175257732 262% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 519.0 206.0 252% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72832369942 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 3.78020617076 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48521901887 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 127.690721649 185% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45472061657 0.622605031667 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 290.88556701 260% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.463917525773 862% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.8272112845 44.8134815571 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 122.7 76.5299724578 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.95 16.8248392259 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 4.34317383033 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 7.41237113402 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309351515704 0.216113520407 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115341533421 0.0766984524023 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924944430644 0.0603063233224 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216867887669 0.12726935374 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811451313181 0.0580467560999 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 8.37731958763 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 8.71597938144 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 41.2886597938 242% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.