Some people think that international car free day is an effective way to reduce the air pollution. Others thinks there are more effective ways to do this.
Discuss both side and give your opinion.
People have different views about whether international car free days are a good way to help cut air pollution or other ways to tackle this problem. While encouraging people not to use cars is god for the environment, I believe that there are several ways that are more effective.
On the one hand, car-free days is an important way to solve the pollution problem. Since a high proportion of exhausted gas can be produce by cars, it is better if more people recognize and reduce their car driving time. Instead, it could be a greater help when people change their type of vehicle into some that are more friendly to the environment such as bike. Moreover, by not using cars, we will not demand a huge amount of fuel; this leads to lesser demands on mineral exploitation. Therefore, the environment will not be polluted because of human needs.
On the other hand, there are more effective ways to deal with air pollution. Firstly, governments can invest more money into education. By doing this, we can teach children to throw used garbage in the right places, and thus, the air will not be polluted by the smell of wasted products. Secondly, people can run campaigns that encourage families to grow small plants in their houses. When more and more people are willing to join these campaigns, it will eventually help the air cleaner in the long-term.
In conclusion, it is understandable that some people think international car-free days are an effective way to solve air pollution, but it seems to me that there are still other ways to tackle this problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.48453608247 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 937.175257732 138% => OK
No of words: 270.0 206.0 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8037037037 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63969123605 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 127.690721649 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548148148148 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 290.88556701 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4452658006 44.8134815571 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7692307692 76.5299724578 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 16.8248392259 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 4.34317383033 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404935159042 0.216113520407 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143700668601 0.0766984524023 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145575506342 0.0603063233224 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292194739944 0.12726935374 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141758902655 0.0580467560999 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 8.37731958763 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 8.71597938144 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 7.59969072165 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 41.2886597938 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.