Some say you should always marry for love others say that in an uncertain world it is wiser to marry for money Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and

Nowadays, money is one of the most significant materials in our lives. To many people, it is appropriate to marry for money rather than love. However, I believe that both love and money should be bouncetogether in any marriages.

Certainly, money is an important part in our lives [TS]. It is hard for any persons to accept a partner which* does not have money or at least a job to take care of future family. Hence, said “marry for money” also has its right in some extent.

However, love should be the root of any marriages [TS]. Firstly, it is because love is such a glue to connect two persons which have their own lives, become one (NC). So, they can share each other’s the sadness, happiness to overcome any difficulties in daily lives. Moreover, love makes people growing up because they do not only have responsibility to themselves, but also to their partners as well. That is why marrying with love is always encouraged.

In my opinion, I think that both love and money is both necessary [TS]. Marriage relying on money would be rapidly disintegrated when unfortunately the money is run out. In contrary*, marriage relying on love would sometimes come to end when they could not earn money to carry out family (NC), such as paying bills, buying food, etc. Therefore, love and money should stand together in marriage even though their contribution could be unbalanced (NC).

As we have seen, marriage without either money or love would come to an unhappy ending. So I believe that they both have their own contribution to a merry family.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, at least, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 4.92783505155 244% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 32.9175257732 64% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 937.175257732 153% => OK
No of words: 286.0 206.0 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0034965035 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70235388398 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 127.690721649 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 290.88556701 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.463917525773 862% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3383056718 44.8134815571 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1764705882 76.5299724578 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 16.8248392259 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 4.34317383033 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 7.41237113402 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261723502803 0.216113520407 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924134575539 0.0766984524023 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562263908039 0.0603063233224 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164046274772 0.12726935374 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514744432479 0.0580467560999 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 8.37731958763 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 41.2886597938 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 8.62886597938 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.