The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...e consumption of chicken had an increase,while the consumption of lamb,beef and fish w...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , beef
...n increase,while the consumption of lamb,beef and fish witnessed a decrease In 1979,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ted considerably in the following years.In 2004,the European consumed nearly 250 g...
^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...,the European consumed nearly 250 grams.In terms of beef,in1979,the consumption of...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... at 230 grams and in the following years,it also had a considerable fluctuation.In ...
^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...,it also had a considerable fluctuation.In 2004,it dropped to 120 grams Regarding...
^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...,it also had a considerable fluctuation.In 2004,it dropped to 120 grams Regarding...
^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...before it went down to 53 grams in 2004.The consumption of fish was at over 50 gram...
^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...on of fish was at over 50 grams in 1979.It had a slight fluctuation from 1979 to 2...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 32.9175257732 39% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 26.3917525773 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 937.175257732 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 206.0 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02580645161 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24673212799 2.54303337028 128% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 127.690721649 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522580645161 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 212.4 290.88556701 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6804123711 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 155.0 16.3608247423 947% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 44.8134815571 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 779.0 76.5299724578 1018% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 155.0 16.8248392259 921% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 30.0 4.34317383033 691% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 2.54639175258 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0509055772114 0.216113520407 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509055772114 0.0766984524023 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478456951575 0.12726935374 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650486672378 0.0580467560999 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 79.8 8.37731958763 953% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -68.93 70.7449484536 -97% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 3.82989690722 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 61.4 7.45979381443 823% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.08 8.71597938144 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.08 7.59969072165 185% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 41.2886597938 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 8.62886597938 649% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 64.0 8.54432989691 749% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 8.15463917526 687% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.