The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

Essay topics:

The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

The line graph illustrates that the number of fish and some different kinds of meat were consumed in a european country from 1979 to 2004
It is clear that the consumption of chicken had an increase,while the consumption of lamb,beef and fish witnessed a decrease
In 1979,the consumption of chicken started at 180 grams per week.it continued to rise before it fluctuated considerably in the following years.In 2004,the European consumed nearly 250 grams.In terms of beef,in1979,the consumption of it was at 230 grams and in the following years,it also had a considerable fluctuation.In 2004,it dropped to 120 grams
Regarding lamb,in1979,the number of it consumed was at 150 grams and it varied significantly in the following years before it went down to 53 grams in 2004.The consumption of fish was at over 50 grams in 1979.It had a slight fluctuation from 1979 to 2004 before it had a downward trend to under 50 grams in 2004

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-04 hananguyen 78 view
2022-07-18 Blackcytrus view
2022-01-19 Hoang chang 61 view
2021-09-12 ryshad 73 view
2021-03-30 Mirfayzbek 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...e consumption of chicken had an increase,while the consumption of lamb,beef and fish w...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , beef
...n increase,while the consumption of lamb,beef and fish witnessed a decrease In 1979,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ted considerably in the following years.In 2004,the European consumed nearly 250 g...
^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...,the European consumed nearly 250 grams.In terms of beef,in1979,the consumption of...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... at 230 grams and in the following years,it also had a considerable fluctuation.In ...
^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...,it also had a considerable fluctuation.In 2004,it dropped to 120 grams Regarding...
^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...,it also had a considerable fluctuation.In 2004,it dropped to 120 grams Regarding...
^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...before it went down to 53 grams in 2004.The consumption of fish was at over 50 gram...
^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...on of fish was at over 50 grams in 1979.It had a slight fluctuation from 1979 to 2...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 32.9175257732 39% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 26.3917525773 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 937.175257732 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 206.0 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02580645161 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24673212799 2.54303337028 128% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 127.690721649 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522580645161 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 212.4 290.88556701 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6804123711 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 155.0 16.3608247423 947% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 44.8134815571 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 779.0 76.5299724578 1018% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 155.0 16.8248392259 921% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 30.0 4.34317383033 691% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 2.54639175258 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0509055772114 0.216113520407 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509055772114 0.0766984524023 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478456951575 0.12726935374 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650486672378 0.0580467560999 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 79.8 8.37731958763 953% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -68.93 70.7449484536 -97% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 3.82989690722 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 61.4 7.45979381443 823% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.08 8.71597938144 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.08 7.59969072165 185% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 41.2886597938 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 8.62886597938 649% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 64.0 8.54432989691 749% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 8.15463917526 687% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.