The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant.
The tables show the comparison of fairtrade for coffee and bananas which was sold in five European sections around 1999 and 2004. It is measured in millions of euros. In general, it can be seen that the sale of coffee and bananas had a different increase in some countries. UK got a dramatic increase for coffee and Switzerland for bananas. Unfortunately, sales of bananas in Denmark and Sweden decreased slightly in 2004.
At the beginning of the first table, Switzerland that was the highest coffee sales in 1999 obtained second position in 2004. While UK received the largest sale of coffee in 2004. It rising 18,5 million euros was 15,5 higher than Switzerland. And the lowest positions were Denmark and Sweden that each only rose around 0,2 million of euros.
In the second table, Switzerland obtaining the uppermost sales of bananas in 1999 and 2004 climbed 32 million euros. It was more elevated than UD that only grew 4,5 million euros in 2004. Meanwhile, Sweden going down around 0,8 million euros was the undermost bananas sales and it was 0,3 million lesser than Denmark.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-28 | charlotte1412 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | charlotte1412 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | el-naz | 67 | view |
- The table below shows sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 75
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... 1999 obtained second position in 2004. While UK received the largest sale of coffee ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 32.9175257732 27% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 937.175257732 97% => OK
No of words: 184.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92934782609 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50230871657 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 127.690721649 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 290.88556701 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6796847369 44.8134815571 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5833333333 76.5299724578 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 16.8248392259 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 4.34317383033 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193062066172 0.216113520407 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835149912969 0.0766984524023 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790723791618 0.0603063233224 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146976201916 0.12726935374 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717653399366 0.0580467560999 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 8.37731958763 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 70.7449484536 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 7.45979381443 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 8.71597938144 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 8.62886597938 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 8.15463917526 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.