Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this What role should traditions have in our lives Give r

Some people believe that certain traditions are the hindrance on the way to progress and they think that we have to unchain ourselves from those customs. While conservative people feel that tradition is the way of life and they should not let it go.
Social evils such as slavery, human sacrifice and untouchability have been practised and justified in name of tradition and culture. Some of these customs still prevail in different parts of the world and others ceased to exist. Social reformers had to put strenuous effort to abolish those customs, which people had followed so fiercely. Older generation created these customs with their limited knowledge about life during that time. But those traditions are proved to be wrong over the period. For example, In many traditions, the woman doesn't have the right to speak or go out. But due to the advancement of society, people understood that everyone should have equal rights. Nevertheless, some people who are ardent believers of their tradition continue to follow old practices. In various parts of the world, we can see many customs which are not acceptable in today's world. We should not follow one tradition blindly, just because our ancestors had followed it. For the betterment of society, we should let go of those traditions and adapt to a new lifestyle.
However, our culture and beliefs have played a key role in moulding the current society. It gave moral value to the people and helped them to lead a good life. Respecting elders, treat everyone with respect are some of the values that we got from our tradition. These values put people together and taught them to live together as a society.
In my opinion, we should put aside those customs which are against the progress of human society. Furthermore, we must give more importance to innovations rather than old traditions.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 540, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... example, In many traditions, the woman doesnt have the right to speak or go out. But ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...elders, treat everyone with respect are some of the values that we got from our tradition. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 32.9175257732 106% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 937.175257732 164% => OK
No of words: 309.0 206.0 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98381877023 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5947751051 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 127.690721649 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 290.88556701 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6804123711 150% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.8491541298 44.8134815571 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.0526315789 76.5299724578 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2631578947 16.8248392259 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 4.34317383033 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257813197748 0.216113520407 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783671673956 0.0766984524023 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058275476022 0.0603063233224 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14572140123 0.12726935374 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586398392576 0.0580467560999 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 8.37731958763 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 41.2886597938 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.