cIt is widely argued about the money government spend on athletes for the Olympics training. Some people think that athletes represent their country's status, so the government should support them. However, others think that the Government should spend on money on public health.
When an athlete participates in Olympics, he is not fighting for himself, he is fighting for the country. It is that country's status he is representing. Winning a medal in the Olympics is an achievement for the country. Everyone around the world appreciates the country for their performance. So money spent on athletes is not just for a few people, it is for that country's stature and the sports. Moreover, it helps the talented athlete's dream of getting a medal in the Olympics. They have done a lot of hard work to reach that position. Furthermore, it encourages the youth to build their talents. Athletes hold the nation's prestige in front of the world, the money spent on them is not a squander.
However, the government should spend more money on the welfare of society. Public health is more important than the Olympics. There is no use of an Olympic medal if the citizens are deprived of necessities. The Government has to take care of the issues like poverty, childbirth by providing food and jobs. They should create programs to encourage people to stay active and healthy, especially children. Spend more money on the physical training section in schools and provide them with healthy food. If people are healthy, it is likely to have more talents in the country. Then the government don't need to spend time and money in finding talents for the Olympics. Moreover, the workforce would become stronger because of this and the economy will boom. Eventually, this will improve the sports field of that nation. a
In my view, the money spent on athletes is not waste, but the Government should spend the same amount on encouraging public health.
- Instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics governments should spend the money on programmes encouraging the public to be active and stay healthy To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answe 56
- Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this What role should traditions have in our lives Give r 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: CIt
cIt is widely argued about the money govern...
^^^
Line 2, column 689, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e world, the money spent on them is not a squander. However, the government should spend ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nts in the country. Then the government dont need to spend time and money in finding...
^^^^
Line 3, column 816, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...mprove the sports field of that nation. a In my view, the money spent on athlete...
^
Line 3, column 816, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mprove the sports field of that nation. a In my view, the money spent on athlete...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, as to, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93865030675 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63175883033 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48773006135 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.4970374548 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.0 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1739130435 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95652173913 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304693287772 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850939707617 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637361379488 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197819646037 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248666224982 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.