The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Given are two maps contrasting the modifications of an island over a course of time to serve region’s visitors.
Perceptibly, the area has been developed into a well-facilities tourist destination with the addition of various amenities without replacing its original nature landscape.
In terms of the former area, it was a pristine island with some trees in the west and the east of the region. Additionally, there was a beach to the left-hand side.
After a significant renovation, the given region became very attractive with the island's tourists. It is noticeable from the second illustration that ten accommodations have been built in the heart of the island, and six others located in further west of the paradise island, to the right-hand of the beach, which is used for swimming. Each bungalow is connected with each other by footpath, and visitors could go to the beach from cottages by the same way. In the middle of two groups of accommodations, a reception has been constructed, which is surrounded by vehicle track leading to the restaurant in the north and a pier for sailing in the south of the island.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-24 | nvtrung309 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Hồ Phi Long | 10 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram below shows the process of making olive oil Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below Write at least 150 words 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 937.175257732 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 206.0 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98404255319 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06173742827 2.54303337028 120% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 127.690721649 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 290.88556701 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8571400529 44.8134815571 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 76.5299724578 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 16.8248392259 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 4.34317383033 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110249903707 0.216113520407 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471665354898 0.0766984524023 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362297381044 0.0603063233224 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069477580586 0.12726935374 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031111579898 0.0580467560999 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 8.37731958763 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 8.71597938144 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 7.59969072165 123% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 41.2886597938 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.