The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The maps illustrate how the road access to a city hospital had changed over the period between 2007 and 2010. Overall, there was a significant increase in the parking space, allowing more vehicles to be parked around the hospital. Furthermore, a large bus station was built next to the hospital road, replacing the former small bus stops.
In 2007, there was only one park for both staff and public vehicles, which was situated at the east of hospital road and between city road and ring road which circled around the hospital. And there are 6 small bus stops lining along both sides of Hospital Road.
While in 2010, the previous car park became only for staff and a slightly larger public car park appeared on the east side of the hospital. And the previous bus stops were replaced by a formal bus station, at the west of hospital road. Another obvious change was that the two intersections at the end of Hospital Road were reconstructed as roundabouts.
- Q:- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Percentage of Australian Men and Women doing Regular Physical Activity in 2010 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give yo 89
- Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than history. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information below by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 26.3917525773 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 937.175257732 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 206.0 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78443113772 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45949655626 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 127.690721649 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 290.88556701 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.554516317 44.8134815571 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 76.5299724578 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 4.34317383033 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17948143637 0.216113520407 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917261298119 0.0766984524023 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077129171384 0.0603063233224 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13621880891 0.12726935374 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292351658911 0.0580467560999 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 8.37731958763 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 70.7449484536 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 8.71597938144 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 41.2886597938 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.