The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts demonstrate proportions of industry sector providing to Turkey’s economy, between 2000 and 2016.
Overall, at the beginning of the period agriculture was the most significant sector, while construction was the least. In comparison, another chart health care and education became the largest segment and the lowest contribution was made by finance, business and other. The data can be divided on to two groups: one group experienced an upward trend while the others underwent a different one.
With respect to the former group, it can be seen from the charts, construction accounted for 3% in 2000 and experienced more than threefold increased to 10% in 2016. At the same time, there was a rise of 5% to 8% in the portion of finance, business and other. Moreover, the percentage of manufacturing and trade, utilities group and transportation slightly went up by 2% in 2016, making up 12% and 14%.
Turning to the latter group, it displayed the opposite trend. Agriculture was the main sector providing income to the country with almost a quarter in 2000, then suffered a dramatic decline to only 14% in the next 16 years. In 2016, a minimal fall was apparent in leisure and hospitality sector and government fell by 3% which reported to 14% and 9% respectively. The only segment remaining stable over the period was healthcare and education, representing 17%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | mareen0302 | 78 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 937.175257732 124% => OK
No of words: 228.0 206.0 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96745453138 2.54303337028 117% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 127.690721649 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 290.88556701 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.2037160431 44.8134815571 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 76.5299724578 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 16.8248392259 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 4.34317383033 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175077745315 0.216113520407 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062112185846 0.0766984524023 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691933208008 0.0603063233224 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122631725204 0.12726935374 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754341399108 0.0580467560999 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 8.37731958763 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 8.71597938144 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 41.2886597938 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.