Dear Sir or Madam,
Ever since I heard positive reviews about your institution, I decided to enrol for the first available training batch. I am one of the students who has completed the short culinary course on Japanese cuisine hosted last week. Furthermore, I am quite pleasantly surprised at how well-planned the course was.
I particularly enjoyed the one-on-one attention provided to learners as this assisted the learning process much better. The tutoring Chef was extremely kind and patient with all students, including me. That made me feel comfortable and eventually, confident. Additionally, I appreciated the concept of teaching students a single dish a day rather than overwhelming them with numerous complex dishes all at once. This technique helped me perfect each recipe while also giving me the time to develop my own flavour- enhancing methods for each dish. Ever since the session ended last Friday, I have already made two batches of the star dish of the class, Karaage- style fried chicken. I received rave reviews from my family members who gobbled up each batch within minutes.
I would be very keen on returning to the institute to learn another dish to conjure up to serve at my weekend dinners. Perhaps, the institution could host a cooking course focused on Chinese cuisine in light of the Chinese New Year coming up next month. I would be the first to enrol for sure.
Yours sincerely,
Melissa Spark
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
- You recently did a short cookery course The cookery school asked for your feedback on this course Write a letter to the course director at the cookery school In your letter describe what you enjoyed about the course say how much cooking you ve done since 89
- Tourism has become a major source of income for all countries Write the advantages and disadvantages of tourism What should be done to ensure healthy tourism takes place 79
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some scientists think there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Others think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 937.175257732 129% => OK
No of words: 237.0 206.0 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09282700422 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70801280155 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 127.690721649 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691983122363 0.622605031667 111% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 290.88556701 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.13402061856 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6124165343 44.8134815571 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2142857143 76.5299724578 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 16.8248392259 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 4.34317383033 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131960227623 0.216113520407 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425753146038 0.0766984524023 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395219515919 0.0603063233224 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949541232038 0.12726935374 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611398979843 0.0580467560999 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 8.37731958763 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 8.71597938144 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 7.59969072165 124% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 41.2886597938 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 937.175257732 129% => OK
No of words: 237.0 206.0 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09282700422 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70801280155 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 127.690721649 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691983122363 0.622605031667 111% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 290.88556701 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.13402061856 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6124165343 44.8134815571 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2142857143 76.5299724578 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 16.8248392259 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 4.34317383033 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131960227623 0.216113520407 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425753146038 0.0766984524023 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395219515919 0.0603063233224 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949541232038 0.12726935374 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611398979843 0.0580467560999 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 8.37731958763 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 8.71597938144 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 7.59969072165 124% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 41.2886597938 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.