Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Due to globalization, nations across the world have come close to each other; concurrently, this has given rise to the trading of identical goods making it available in any part of the world. In my opinion, it is a positive development as it has promoted economic growth as well as it has made the price affordable.
To begin with, one of the major benefits behind the availability of homogenous goods globally is it has accelerated economic development. To explain it further, a trade agreement between the nations has caused the movement of such goods smoothly. This has created the international market of these goods which are traded on a large scale. Consequently, the flow of capital has augmented which has affected the balance of payments positively. For instance, according to the World Bank Report, China has experienced exponential growth over the past few decades evolving as the second-largest economy of the world due to trading.
Another positive impact of acquiring parallel produces in different nations is the reduction in the cost. To elaborate more, easy trading of alike items has propelled countries to invest in low-cost living nations for business. This measure has brought down the cost of production affecting the overall price of goods. As a result, the products have become economical that even the middle class could bear the cost. For example, according to a business report, the sales of international branded cars which are manufactured in India have observed a rise as it is easy to pocket as compared to imported cars.
In conclusion, homogenization is the cause of obtaining coequal outputs in varied nations. This has stimulated economic expansion and also has controlled the price-tag.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | Tabassum Zaman | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-23 | Delara | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | sameersomaya | 87 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | sameersomaya | 87 | view |
- You recently did a short cookery course The cookery school asked for your feedback on this course Write a letter to the course director at the cookery school In your letter describe what you enjoyed about the course say how much cooking you ve done since 89
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think it is a positive or negative development 87
- Some people think spending on arts is a waste of money rather than a budget should be diverted to other public services. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
- Some scientists think there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Others think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20788530466 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98647835104 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9734063765 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0949368752297 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290158813715 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322985484188 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501439649538 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385294765875 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.