You recently organised an all-day meeting for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback, participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel, but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch.
Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. In your letter,
• Say what the participants liked about the hotel
• Explain why they were unhappy about the food
• Suggest what the manager should do to improve the food in the future
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing this letter to express my dissatisfaction over one of your services provided to my clients during a conference. It was held at one of your banquets for my company VC Enterprises on November 24, 2019 at 8:00 P.M.
Before explaining my problem, I would like you to know that the participants really liked the interior of your hotel. The way it embraced the beauty of traditional culture of Rajasthan, it gave them a feel of a palace. They also admired the hospitality of your reception staff when they were welcomed with flower garlands and pleasant greetings.
Coming to the complaint part, the attendants were quite concerned about the food served and the cutlery used. They were less impressed by the quality of curry as it lacked freshness and an unpleasant odour was coming out of it. Moreover, the breads were not hot enough and it seemed liked they were prepared in the morning as they got hard. Furthermore, the lack of proper serving spoons made it unbearable and several of my clients were annoyed as they had to use same spoon for different dishes.
I believe you are open to suggestions. Being in a hospitality sector, food in my opinion is the backbone of services provided. You should bring up a change in the way it is cooked by adding additional quality checking steps so that there is no repetition of cases like this one. Additionally, you should also keep in mind about the stock of cutlery which needs to be present while serving and you may also appoint someone who can properly manage all these aspects.
I hope you will take the suggestions positively and will look into the matter to do the needful.
Yours faithfully,
Hemant Tejwani
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | drmona.914 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | hitakshi patel | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | hitakshi patel | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | the7850r | 73 | view |
- You have recently started work in a new company.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letterexplain why you changed jobsdescribe your new jobtell him/her your other news 61
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decided to do this. 73
- Some believe that training is necessary to be a good teacher, others think that teachers don’t need a training course. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Many parents encourage young people to leave home when they become older, while others think that they should stay at home with the family. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people believe that success in life depends on hard work and determination, while other believe that other factors like money and personal appearance are important.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, really, so, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 32.9175257732 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 937.175257732 152% => OK
No of words: 296.0 206.0 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81756756757 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67482028028 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 127.690721649 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 290.88556701 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.13402061856 120% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3420485499 44.8134815571 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 76.5299724578 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 16.8248392259 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 4.34317383033 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279868837557 0.216113520407 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078056724321 0.0766984524023 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559325637186 0.0603063233224 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123030583674 0.12726935374 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670723073301 0.0580467560999 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 8.37731958763 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 8.71597938144 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 41.2886597938 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.