Creative artists should always be given freedom to express their own ideas (in words, picture, music, film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is certainly true that art has enriched human emotions for a long time. Humans have a long history with artworks in term of expressed human’s mind or presented humans’ perspective. Therefore, the freedom of expression is very important to an art producer. Some people think that the expression of an artist should not be restricted by the government, while some argue that some regulations can help to control an artist to not produce appropriate artwork. Personally, I do agree with this statement for a number of reasons.
Firstly, art is a very important symbol of culture. Humans have used art to present their ideas to others. Art represents taste, richness and traditions of people in a society which can transmit the value to other societies or later generations. Those artworks such as literature, sculptures or paintings are all produced from human creativity. If other matters limit the freedom of expression, it will difficult for art makers to illustrate their perspective to other people.
Secondly, the beauty of art is overestimated. Art has many merits to human beings. Artwork can flourish our society. Artwork can enrich people mind and present different perspective to a wide audience. The creativity of artists always comes from deep into artists’ mind which is hard to control from other features. With some pressure from the government, it can scope an artist’s perspective and aspects to their capability in artwork.
Thirdly, the creativity of a painting or a literate requires the idea in an artist’s though which is very difficult to produce. As well as music producers can find wonderful beats from all nature such as bird’s singing, waves roaring or wind blowing. Works of art also need the freedom of thinking perhaps with the government restrictions its can be destroyed.
In conclusion, limiting an artist expression disturbs the process of thinking an artist. Any type of pressure or restrictions should not be used by the city. Art producers should be able to present their ideas freely in order to enrich the culture of human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-06-11 | pratik_dkr1 | 28 | view |
- Most of the schools are planning to replace sports and exercise classes with more academic sessions What is your opinion on this change How is this change will affect children s life in your view 85
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.(rewrite1) 80
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 72
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 93
- Many people believe that international tourism has negative implications on their countries. What is the reason for it? What can be done to change the negative attitude towards international tourism? 70
Sentence: If other matters limit the freedom of expression, it will difficult for art makers to illustrate their perspective to other people.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to will and difficult
Sentence: Artwork can enrich people mind and present different perspective to a wide audience.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to people and mind
its can be destroyed.
it can be destroyed.
the process of thinking an artist.
the process of thinking by an artist.
the process of thinking of an artist.
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.455 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 340 350
No. of Characters: 1691 1500
No. of Different Words: 173 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.294 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.974 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.727 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.455 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.294 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.297 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.494 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.056 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5