Some people think that it is acceptable to use the animals in any way for benefit od human being. While others think that it is not justifiable discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Animals’ right regulation has generated a great deal of discussion. For this reason, some people believed that using animals to everything that people want in order to beneficial purpose are more likely acceptable. However, others argue that it is unforgivable as animals are also inhabitants in the world. While it is reasonable, I am totally convinced that there are several measurements to consider using animals such as species extinction, food chains, and respecting green idea.
On the one hand, animals can bring a numerous number of advantages to human life. So, people argue that it is acceptable to use them in any way. As a straightforward example, people can use a cow and the other animals as their food. Again, they are not only eating something from a cow but also use the skin or even use their ability in agriculture. Therefore, animals are completely essential for human life to help them in the predictability of everyday life. Thanks to animals bring a great benefit for people; they believe that it is acceptable to kill them. Yet, there is an ethical side to despite the argument.
On the other hand, some people believe that using animals without considering their condition is unforgivable activity. It is because animals are also inhabitants in this earth. For instance, if people kill bluntly and regularly the animals only for their necessary, it is extremely humanism. As a consequence, animal rights are regulated to take up against the perception of using animal in any way. Therefore, animal should not be used to human benefit if it is not urgent and is inappropriate.
The animals, I am of opinion, should be deserved and should them as there are a number of measurements. First of all, the species which are going to extinct are completely danger for human life. If all animals particularly species, which have a small number habitat in the world, do not exist anymore, people will not have food resources anymore from the animals. Secondly, the case can break of the food chains which have already existed on many years. Lastly, as food chains are getting rid off, it will damage considerably nature surrounding. Consequently, it will be serious a problem of human life if people use animals to their benefit of human being.
In conclusion, although animals are tremendously useful for human life, people should pay more attention to the animal’s condition as it can be dangerous for environment. Where possible, people can use or kill animals, while they should make a conservation to deserve them. It can keep environmental from untold damage and deserve food chains.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2015-01-13 | Fadlanmuzakki | 60 | view |
- In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city Centre, in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city.Give reason in support of and opposing the policy, and give your own opinion. 70
- (SAMPLE)Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness? 80
- The Chart and table below give information abaout population figures in Japan. 50
- The table below gives the information on consumer spending on different items in five five different countries in 2000. 75
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 80
a great deal of discussion.
a great deal of discussions.
using animals to everything that people want in order to beneficial purpose are more likely acceptable.
using animals ...is more likely acceptable.
Sentence: Yet, there is an ethical side to despite the argument.
Description: The token to is not usually followed by a preposition
Suggestion: Refer to to and despite
is unforgivable activity.
is an unforgivable activity.
Sentence: For instance, if people kill bluntly and regularly the animals only for their necessary, it is extremely humanism.
Description: A qualifier, pre is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to extremely and humanism
should be deserved and should them as there are a number of measurements.
should be deserved and should be nice to them as there are a number of measurements.
are completely danger for human life
are completely dangerous for human's life
it will be serious a problem of human life
it will be serious as a problem of human's life
Sentence: If all animals particularly species, which have a small number habitat in the world, do not exist anymore, people will not have food resources anymore from the animals.
Description: The fragment animals particularly species is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace particularly with adjective
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
Read a good grammar book.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 434 350
No. of Characters: 2110 1500
No. of Different Words: 196 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.564 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.862 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.745 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.36 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.89 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.64 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.493 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5