13. Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that all the majors at university should have equal proportions of boys and girls in the name of education equity. In my mind, this change would be unrealistic and unfair.
To begin with, it is simply unrealistic to ask for the same number of university enrollments for male and female students. The number of students on a major depends on the applications an institute receives. If a university decided to fill all the courses with the same numbers of boys and girls, it would need enough applicants. In reality, some subjects are more popular with one gender than the other, and it is not practical to aim for equal proportion. For example, nursing tends to attract more females and it would be difficult to enrol an equal number of males with fifty per cent of the places on the course.
Apart from the practical concern expressed above, it would be unfair to base admission to a university on gender. University should select suitable candidates according to qualifications. In this way, both female and male students have the same opportunities and applicants know that they will be successful if they work hard at school. If a female student is the best candidate, it is surely wrong to reject her in favour of a male with lower qualification and academic performance.
In conclusion, the selection of university students should be based on merit, and it would be both impractical and unfair to change the procedure based on gender.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | yomost232131 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | hien2422006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | adoke | 56 | view |
- 13 Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2015 67
- 4 The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologist in work after five years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting 89
- the diagrams show the differences in the consumption of water for agricultural industrial and household sectors in those six areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, apart from, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.896 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8520869552 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5738477241 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221629088947 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084421220937 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360967817696 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1276951415 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436843415643 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.