14.1.2017: In schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts while boys like sciences. What are the reasons for this tendency and do you think this tendency should be changed?
Subject choice is a vital factor in school and university life. These days, there are more and more female students enrolling in art classes while males tend to opt for science subjects. This could be explained by several elements, and I think that it is best not to apply any changes to this tendency.
Several reasons explain why students choose different courses at school and tertiary levels. First, the most significant is the natural characteristic of genders, male students are interested in calculating, and analytical abilities to outperform, for example, maths and science. And girls are more emotional and sensitive to have advantages in understanding some subjects relate to the imagination, such as art, and literature. Furthermore, each of the two sexes shows their distinct excellence and strengths in their favored kinds of subjects. As a result, they tend to participate in the classes that suit their capacity.
I believe that it should not be altered for some reasons. Initially, the subject choice is their right so adults should force children to study subjects that they do not enjoy. For example, they compel their schoolgirl students to learn sciences instead of literature which leads to bad results and poses big pressure. In addition, the option of the course does not rely on gender. These days, many girls still learn natural grades and boys choose artistic courses. Therefore, letting them be free and making them feel that they are respected and listened to.
In conclusion, the choice of subjects is not related to gender but their innate abilities and preferences. This trend does not harm and should not be changed
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- 4 6 2022 Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 78
- The diagrams below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 61
- Some people feel that cities should allow for spaces for graffiti while others feel it should be banned Discuss both sides and give your own opinion sample cue card 76
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14869888476 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70768787672 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591078066914 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9667815491 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5625 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240745719217 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072827110516 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661723243669 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150939546054 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667623736098 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.