(19/03/2016) - People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that these days people are able to buy many reasonably priced products. Although there can be no doubt that this trend can be beneficial to society to a certain extent, I assert that it will do more harm than good.
On the one hand, several reasons explained the popularity in the inexpensive price of goods. Firstly, the most significant of which is the number of products consumed which leads to the economic development of countries. This is because low-priced products encourage the spenders to buy and consume more and more. As a result, more jobs will be created as companies expand their sales of consumer goods, reducing the unemployment figures and enabling more people to share in the increasing prosperity. In addition, people can buy more goods, for example, TV smarts, phones which can improve their standards of living. And also they save more money on childcare, health, and education.
On the other hand, there are various reasons why I believe low-priced goods bring us more harm. The first reason is that overproduction can affect our environments such as grazing from agriculture or smoking from the factories leads to destruct ozone and air. As a result, the cost of recovering the damage we cause to the habitat is huge. Moreover, cheaper products are almost invariably associated with poor quality. For example, when cheap imports from China first entered the American and European markets, consumers quickly realized that items such as electronic goods either did not work or quickly broke down and the materials themselves were not durable.
To sum up, besides the many advantages of purchasing cheaper goods, I still believe that the disadvantages of low-priced goods outweigh the advantages. As cheaper products are often of low quality and are produced in unsustainable ways,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-07 | my220904 | 67 | view |
| 2024-04-26 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many people today feel that art classes are no longer necessary in schools They think that technology classes are more important To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles 76
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports is bteer like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Childhood obesity has become a serious problem in recent years What are the primary cause of this What measures should be taken to reduce childhood obesity 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11784511785 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74884019018 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8044163464 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178925239034 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577940290858 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532009416906 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11543376788 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497756355841 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.