40. Some peole think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shop or public transport. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Thank the technological advancement, our life becomes more convenient than ever before. The booming of using technological gadgets, especially the mobile phone, makes a big step for the development of human society. However, some people argue that mobile phone users should stop using them in specific places, such as libraries or public transport. I agree with this opinion.
There is a range of reasons that support this idea. First of all, using a mobile phone in some places requires a quiet atmosphere for concentration such as a library, which causes a great deal of disturbance to other people. For those who frequently come to the library for typical activities requiring intensive concentration, such as reading, researching, or studying, only small sounds can easily bother them. Bell-ringing, message announcement, answering, or making a phone call could annoy and interrupt other working or thinking processes. As a result, mobile phone users have adverse effects on other people's productivity and working quality. Moreover, not only libraries but also the mobile phone is a dangerous distraction in transportation. Annually, many fatal accidents happen with the leading causes of using mobile phones when controlling vehicles.
However, many people said that banning mobile phones in a public place is not necessary from the opposite view. To maintain the tranquil atmosphere in the library or safety in the driving process, we can turn off our phones or put them in silent or vibrate status. It is not a practical solution. It is challenging for people to ignore their parent phone call or neglect the message from their close friend.
To sum up, we have known the enormous benefits mobile phones bring to us. But in some cases, we should consider the social situation to use it reasonably and adequately without affecting surrounded people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, such as, as a result, first of all, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28040540541 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88224386745 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597972972973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.382023927 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9411764706 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228883340255 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702050576161 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667150197866 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137792959309 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036229063554 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.