The advancement of Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how people in other places live. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is apparent that global connection and humans’ access to oversea cultures has been improved unprecedentedly thanks to the facilitation of advanced Internet technology. There appears to be no need for people to go abroad in person in order to have a comprehension of indigenous lives. As for me, making a trip to an exotic territory is much preferable in many ways.
First and formost, a particularly notable case of this matter is that the information provided on free websites are seemingly the tip of the iceberg, which precludes people’s understanding of local lifestyles. As most of the written articles are somehow identical, these pieces of information containing approximately less than 1000 words are impossible to reveal what deeply lies behind the practice and customs of foreigners, which is implicit in their daily activities. For example, it is obvious that little or no online source will tell visitors that all Vietnamese people have “green oil” (nearly a type of holy water) as an indispensable household item to solve every simple heathcare problems, from headaches to bumps and bruises.
The second reason for my propensity is the unreliability of data and misinformation on virtual sites provided for free. It is often the case that online bloggers or writers do not take full responsibility for what they post on mass media, since their work normally includes information that has been gathered in another article before without investigating the accuracy. Therefore, if readers do not initally have an adequate understanding of how others organize their life, they will be entirely manipulated, which not only causes misunderstanding but also conflicts sometimes.
For the reasons presented above, I strongly commit to the notion that efforts to adopt novel traditions should be made by trips or jouneys to where these practices belong in lieu of relying entirely on the Internet.
- The advancement of Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how people in other places live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes Suggest some solutions 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, as for, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30263157895 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09540697184 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661184210526 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5760337509 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.2 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131738207429 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458949356432 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353522701413 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683826747712 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295827135245 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.