Advantage and disadvantage of international tourism

Advantage and disadvantage of international tourism

The past 50 years have seen a considerable increase global tourism. Although some people argue that industrial tourism has negative effects, other including me believe that tourism is benefit. Both of these views will be discussed in this essay.

The part of the society have different idea about tourism. First of all, it is an undeniable that when global tourism into faraway places for visit who need certain novel facilities for convenience them, such as hotels, restaurants and high ways. So this trend will be result spoil natural of animal and eco-system. Beside that they produce amount of litter and rubbish which is not recycle and is threat for environment. Secondly, the expansion of global tourism would be cause certain traditional profession dead out such as fishing, farming. A recent survey shown that more than 100 traditional skills in host areas are superseded by contemporary vacation.

On the other hand, the majority of people say that the positive impact of expansion of global tourism are too excess. First of all, it is clear that bringing tourism will be result create more job opportunity and consequently bring income and fund. For instance, coming global tourism who need tour guide for have enjoyable time, save time and cost so it is an amazing chance for folk. Secondly, it could be encourage governments and wealthy individuals to enterprises in these areas. This issue will be revolutionize social welfare and raising the quality of life in these cities.

By way of conclusion, it seems that tourism has both positive and negative effect for host countries but the advantages are outweighs than drawback.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
..., the expansion of global tourism would be cause certain traditional profession dead out...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...superseded by contemporary vacation. On the other hand, the majority of peopl...
^^
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d wealthy individuals to enterprises in this areas. This issue will be revolutionize...
^^^^
Line 7, column 570, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...fare and raising the quality of life in this cities. By way of conclusion, it see...
^^^^
Line 9, column 26, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...his cities. By way of conclusion, it seem that tourism has both positive and nega...
^^^^
Line 9, column 75, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... tourism has both positive and negative affect for host countries but the advantages are o...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21897810219 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72696861443 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7990137923 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258153676235 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831557703068 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128461392962 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292112249934 0.151304729494 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.355262988485 0.056905535591 624% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.