The advantages of the spread of English as a global language will continue to outweigh its disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Speaking English as a global language has been a controversial topic of debate in recent years. Many countries in the world speak English as the first language. I strongly agree that the spread of English as a global language outweighs its drawbacks.
On the one hand, people all over the world using the same language in communication will elevate work effectively. In communication, information is conveyed to receivers and results returned. Furthermore, in order to get higher education, for example, to study abroad, overseas students have to get adequate knowledge of English, so that they can catch up with subjects that they want to study. Besides, to meet the demands of labour, developed countries introduce immigrating policies for employees coming from other countries. Therefore, speaking English widely is essential. In opening economy, workers who can speak English fluently will have more opportunities to find jobs and to get higher positions in companies.
On the other hand, using English in international communication also has some disadvantages. Firstly, language cultures are reflected because young generations are tendy to forget their mother tongue. In addition, it takes people many years to learn four skills: listening, speaking, reading and writing.
In conclusion, I believe English should be promoted as a global language. Even though language barriers exist in the world, English as a foreign language brings more benefits.
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 89
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities 56
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54017857143 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00294485035 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638392857143 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7601853163 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6428571429 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217553227431 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080573826248 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103791749072 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143508416192 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974102469074 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.