All cars that burn fossil fuel s should be banned and electric cars should replace them?
Do you agree or disagree?
It has been argued that most contemporary automobiles using gasoline should be prohibited and electronic vehicles use would be an appropriate replacement. In my viewpoint, I agree that electronic cars would create more benefits than motor cars’ ones. Firstly, this essay will discuss the noticeable decreasing level of contamination. Secondly, some conveniences electronic vehicles may have on our lives.
It is environmentally friendly to use electric cars as they reduce a significant amount of greenhouse gas in the environment. It is because they run mainly on battery which does not produce any tailpipe emissions compared to a large amount of petrol fumes produced by conventional vehicles. When the polluted air from petrol cars is cut down, global warming will be less serious. Nearly all researchers believe that electric cars have smaller environmental impact than petrol cars do. The high torque in electric cars makes acceleration seamless and smooth.
The benefits electronic cars may bring are very obvious. Gasoline or diesel will no longer be used to operate cars if all electric vehicles are put into use because their battery can be rechargeable. Thus, the chance of getting to a gas station for refuel is rare. In addition, due to the latest and highly innovative engine, drivers would feel how quiet and smooth battery-powered cars can be in just one ride.
In conclusion, electric cars should be alternative substitution for traditional petrol cars due to some advantages they give to the environment as well as their conveniences people benefit from.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-12 | Həsən | 11 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | xuan le ngoc | 56 | view |
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters 77
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 86
- Bar chart: amount spent on consumer goods 56
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework Do you agree or disagree 88
- Bar chart: amount spent on consumer goods 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38152610442 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07121014204 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638554216867 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3188818823 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291148706379 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985621774596 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762799789308 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183232172126 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288496670759 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.