All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric should replace them.Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric should replace them.Do you agree or disagree?

Cars that consume fossil fuels such as petrol or diesel must be outlawed and electric ones should take their place. I agree with the statement because electric cars are more environmentally friendly and not so expensive to own contrast to those that burn fossil fuels.

Cars powered by electricity have a reduced environmental impact on the planet.In addition the air pollution that is created by the fumes from the exhaust of a car will be reduced if electric cars replace them. Also the global warming that the planet is facing with gradually decreased if the fumes are reduced. For example many European country have started to replace them with cars that charge and move with electricity and they have already seen a difference in the atmosphere.

Owning a car which in order to change position and to go to a specific direction burns petrol or diesel means that it should cost a lot of money. Additionally it is extremely expensive to find new sources of fossil fuels, so as a result the cost of them is increasing every year. Moreover, fossil oils are non-renewable resources which means that they will not last forever,therefore renewable alternatives such as electric cars should be introduced. For instance a research showed that the price of diesel the last decade increase dramatically by 58%.

In conclusion I totally agree with the ban of cars that are powered with fossil fuels and the introduction of electric ones,because are less expensive and create less pollution to the planet which will contribute to a better life quality for both humans and animals.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-20 moki 56 view
Essays by user moki :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...uced environmental impact on the planet.In addition the air pollution that is crea...
^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...d environmental impact on the planet.In addition the air pollution that is created by th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... reduced if electric cars replace them. Also the global warming that the planet is f...
^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...ans that it should cost a lot of money. Additionally it is extremely expensive to find new s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 374, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , therefore
...ch means that they will not last forever,therefore renewable alternatives such as electric...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , because
...ls and the introduction of electric ones,because are less expensive and create less poll...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01515151515 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82659017712 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7667919798 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.4 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338552545658 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125919558175 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812926358582 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204329033971 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636584544965 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.