All nations should come forward to take action against use of fossil fuels e.g. gas, oil.
At the very outset, we can unhesitatingly say that, the world depends on fuels means energy required to continue the daily activities of human being. In this case we usually depend on the fossil fuels e.g. gas, oil, coal etc.
People on this earth never think not even a single day without consumption of energy. It is very important to us to continue our daily work without any interruption. It will be only possible if we have enough flawless flow of energy. But the alarming side, however, is that, excessive use of fossil fuels just push the earth to destroy. Such kind of fuel introduces carbon-Di-oxide, carbon mono oxide, sulfur-Di-oxide, CFC etc. to environment. These components not only destroy the ozone layer but also cause of terrific catastrophic to human being. So there should be a new way to cut the use of fossil fuels, and also increase the use of optional way such as renewable energy. The international community must act immediately to ensure that, use of fossil fuels is going low. If it cannot be done, then one day this world may not exist for our future generation. Recently scientists show the dramatic change of ice layer at the pole side. They also explained that how significantly the sea water level is increasing.
As an optimist we may say that, the world is for all. Proper action, however, should take to reduce the use of carbon base fuels and go for new one as early as possible.
After long and vivid discussion, we without a second thought can conclude in the decision that all nation should come forward wholeheartedly to save the earth, otherwise our future generation will never pardon us for our confrontational so call development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he fossil fuels e.g. gas, oil, coal etc. People on this earth never think not eve...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., however, if, may, second, so, then, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81660899654 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83217094735 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2545116757 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254065022687 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635006467991 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761142435917 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146764560266 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287663034551 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.