Although abuse of the system are inevitable social welfare payments are essential to protect the rights citizens have to a guaranteed minimum income in a democratic society Discuss You should write at least 250 words You should spend about 40 minutes on

People have different views about whether governments should be responsible for the provision of support payment since social benefits are open to abuse. From my point of view, I agree with those who argue that a welfare system plays a vital role in a cutting-edge society notwithstanding some potential issues.

From a social and economic perspective, certain financial support and social services from authorities can bring about several significant advantages for not only individuals but also their community as a whole. The first merit could be mentioned is that welfare enables residents, especially those who suffer from unfortunate circumstances, to have a minimal level of well-being. It is undeniable that these payments provide the sick, the disabled, and the unemployed with a subsistence budget to cover their basic needs and lighten their monetary burden as it may be more difficult for them to obtain a job and earn a stable amount of money than the others. Additionally, social securities can be an effective solution to minimize crime occurrence, which is likely to pose a threat and be costly. It is common that poverty leads to illegal behaviors since citizens living in such conditions have to commit thieves, burgaries, robberies, or even murderers to survive their lives. Obviously, providing welfare is more affordable than increasing police patrols or hiring more policemen.

Objectors to a financial safety net hold the opinion that this system can create dependence among members of the society and reduce their motivation to join the labor market. In fact, unless people are incapable of making money due to their health problems, few would opt to rely on such allowance for their whole lives. In the case of jobless individuals, the relief payments are usually temporary. In addition, welfare critics also believe that it might inhibit the development of a country by limiting funds for other essential sectors, however, eliminating welfare programmes is not the answer to this problem. Insteads, governments need to ensure the effectiveness of welfare schemes by paying them to the citizens who are truly qualified to receive it, which can be achieved by investigating the background of the claimed people.

In conclusion, it seems to me that although social welfare is subject to abuse, it is an indispensable element for every nation. Nevertheless, certain regulations should be adopted to ensure the fairness and effectiveness of this measure.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 817, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... threat and be costly. It is common that poverty leads to illegal behaviors since...
^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... relief payments are usually temporary. In addition, welfare critics also believe ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3443877551 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96392016257 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2028772969 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1333333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134341413778 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452138786227 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300357343092 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921503158508 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271422613812 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.