Although many people value their public parks, this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever-growing population or to develop business and boost economies.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
As the global population is rising rapidly, there has been increasing demand for not only food and energy but also space. Despite those who value their public parks, some proposed that these spaces should be repurposed for more residential areas or economic development. To settle this debate, I think we should find ways to implement parks in urban buildings and reuse unused places for residential areas in the event of urban expansion.
Firstly, parks can be placed on top of urban buildings to save space instead. There have been structures throughout history that support gardens or large balconies. In this case, architects could design clusters of apartments with flat, connected rooftops for public parks. Benefits of this include expandable capabilities and closer parks for residents.
On the other hand, residential areas could be built in abandoned cities or excessive areas like golf courts. Abandoned cities or unused land are useful to urbanize. Meanwhile, golf courts are space-intensive and there are too many golf parks these days. Besides, parks are for residents’ recreation and well-being, so removing them would be impractical. With that being said, urban planners should consider unutilized land before demolishing public parks.
On a particular side note, it is actually the outskirts that are responsible for the lack of space. Unlike urban apartments, the outskirts are individual small houses spanning an enormous region. Moreover, this type of city planning is inefficient because it creates pollution from personal vehicles and wastes energy, hindering a city’s development.
In conclusion, I would argue that parks should be maintained at all costs, and city planners should either incorporate them in their design or repurpose and utilize impractical areas.
In conclusion, I would argue that parks should be maintained at all costs, and city planners should either incorporate them in their design or repurpose and utilize impractical areas.
- As housing is a basic necessity for people governments should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think are consumers influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 84
- With the increasing use of and development of new technology many machines are now able to do the work which people use to perform What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 84
- There is evidence that inhaling cigarette smoke causes health problems not only for smokers but for non smokers who inhale other people s smoke In view of this smoking should be banned in all public places even though this would restrict some people s fre 56
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51475409836 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81911164845 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3716951531 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9411764706 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274284555391 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885393847098 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566095955882 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135964426363 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801542658407 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.