Although some people suggest a results-orientation method to encourage students, others would propose improvements as a vital criterion to reward students. In my personal view, the latter is more useful.
Although some people suggest a results-orientation method to encourage students, others would propose improvements as a vital criterion to reward students. In my personal view, the latter is more useful.
On the one hand, it is thought that academic results should be considered as a means of encouragement by educators. Believing that rewards can foment competitions among students, schools should encourage those students having the best academic results in these competitions. For example, giving money to the most cited student in Google Scholar in a year is a fairly method of encouragement students competing for this position. Besides, academic results are specific and the explicit factors for evaluating the students. Therefore, not only do they allow schools to make a perfect decision in terms of encouragement, they but also give credibility to the process of rewarding.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that students should be rewarded based on their improvements. Courtesy of this method all students, apart from their God-given talents, have been motivated to study hard so that they can reach a sustainable improvement. As a result, all different students have an equal chance to be rewarded with regard to their improvements. In addition, by encouraging students based on their improvements, schools give students this opportunity to express a better version of themselves. Thus, whether they are awarded or not, all students break their previous records that could be one the most invaluable incentives in the student’s life helping them not to give up in the process of learning.
To conclude, although encouraging students based on their academic results could be effective, I am convinced that those students that show improvements are more eligible to be rewarded.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Although some people suggest a results-orientation method to encourage students, others would propose improvements as a vital criterion to reward students. In my personal view, the latter is more useful. 73
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some students take a year off between school and university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('fairly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('method') instead of another adjective.
... student in Google Scholar in a year is a fairly method of encouragement students competing for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, in addition, as a result, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42402826855 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14478897723 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558303886926 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2859848421 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.076923077 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31339327746 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141347597935 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206856504454 0.0667982634062 310% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328199808943 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.388531514862 0.056905535591 683% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.