Although there has been a large increase in the numbers of women who go out to work, women continue to do a disproportionate amount of housework and childcare. What can be done to promote greater equality between men and women within the home?
These days, gender inequality has been an urgent problem that could not be fully tackled in many societies for a long time. Consequently, this leads to the gender stereotype that housework and caring children are mostly women’s responsibilities even though women are now having more jobs. In order to address inequality among genders within the home, I will list out several probable solutions in this essay.
Firstly, companies and the Government should conspire and participate to the social change in gender equality by limiting the working time for the women or dividing the workload equally between two genders. A good example for this is that companies and offices should give female workers a privilege of coming back home early to give them more spare time taking care of their families. This approach in turn will help families and couples balance working and personal lives and have the ideal amount of time to take care both of our career and family.
Another method to address this issue is that the Government should take immediate action to change the gender stereotype by using media, celebrities or public events. For example, we can organize a contest which encourages people working in media create videos or short documentary films depicting women’s personal lives and current gender prejudice within home. With the help of events similar to this, media could deliver a message of promoting the greater fairness of the female and supporting women in domestic chores.
In conclusion, the Government and society should take advantage of media and the strength of various companies, thereby narrowing the gender gap between women and men.
- With the increase in global tourism it has become obvious that there are many advantages and disadvantages that can be found from the effects of tourism Do you believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer 91
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that human must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discus 67
- Although there has been a large increase in the numbers of women who go out to work women continue to do a disproportionate amount of housework and childcare What can be done to promote greater equality between men and women within the home 79
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 77
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20895522388 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5549213449 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.0660698994 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.6 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208852595788 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849598741335 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547189915497 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129164043396 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191272673538 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.