The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land in sea. What are the reasons and solutions?
There are a number of factors that explain why animals are at risk of distinction. However, this issue can be resolved by adopting a number of solutions.
Among various reasons, the distinction of several animals, the massive construction of companies is probably most relevant. The first explicit evidence can be shown is that the building of companies is likely accompanied by the destruction of a vast stretch of forest where a variety of wildlife animals inhabit. As a result, when the main habitat is eliminated, a lot of species, like chimpanzees, would have difficulty in finding food and home, which leads them to stand on the edge of distinction. Besides, the way manufacturers treat their waste also exerts a devasting impact on the natural biological communities, threatening the surviving of animals. In fact, some companies recharge toxic waste directly into water bodies without adequate treatment to remove harmful substances. The lives of thousands of plants and organisms living in these bodies are in jeopardy as a result of the industrial waste.
Several actions can be taken to preserve wildlife animals. Firstly, it is integral to outlaw the deforestation of any purposes. To undergo this, all of the forests need to be conserved as national parks where species are provided sufficient accommodation and food chain. In addition, the government should produce some strict rules or regulations in order to hinder the illegal waste disposal of manufacturers. For example, the company may be imposed a higher tax if hazardous waste from their manufacture is detected nearby water bodies.
In conclusion, some measures need to be taken to preserve the wildlife of animal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ation of any purposes. To undergo this, all of the forests need to be conserved as nationa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27037037037 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99341985265 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625925925926 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8719378807 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0267122976557 0.244688304435 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00907610508669 0.084324248473 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0178366160821 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0166985130616 0.151304729494 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123622693243 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.