Recently, there has been a heated debate about the important effect of cellphone on the individuals and society. While some people argue that mobilephone abuse could provoke not only health problems for individuals but also social traffic accidents, I believe that using these electronic devices in the right way might benefit in both children supervision and lessening social criminal rate.
On the one hand, it is believed that overusing cellphone might result in human well-being as well as unexpected cases when commuting. Firstly, scientists have proven that the radiation stemming from these electronic gargets is likely to provoke detrimental effect on brain development. For example, if mother abused cellphone during her pregnancy, the baby would have to be congenital deaf. Secondly, using cellphone in society could activate traffic accidents. Statistics shows that about ten percent unexpected cases in transportation derives from woolgathering people who are calling.
On the other hand, I believe that it is no more plausible than using mobilephone on parental managing children and eliminating crime proportion. First, children supervision seems to be easier thanks to the development of mobilephone. Making a phone call allows parents to check their offsprings’ locations as well as situation. Second, the citizen could help the government restrict criminal rate through a phone call. For example, the witness could provide the description of a robbery owning to mobilephone for policeman.
In conclusion, although there are some notable drawbacks of cellphone abuse, I believe that using mobilephone, by their very nature, brings numerous benefits. It is predicted that people should restrict themselves from overusing these electronic devices in order to take full advantages of mobile phone
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat. 78
- In many countries, children are getting fatter and less fit day by day. Why is it so and suggest solutions. 74
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language. To what estent do you agree with this statement? 78
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69852941176 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.970988616 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6660842384 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131381393989 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422747960504 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297604191415 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787953962892 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265790088352 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.