Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society?
In this contemporary world, smart devices have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. In my perspective, these devices bring both merits and demerits to people.
Firstly, this technology development has various advantages. One of the main benefits of smart devices is the ease to access to the internet. With the internet, people can instantly finish their work, answer their business calls, and so on. Many job opportunities have been created and financially support many impoverished. Another advantage is that these devices are handy. Laptops or smartphones are often portable, which makes them essential for long work trips and also at home. However, besides its beneficial side, this development can be detrimental.
Turn to the other side of the development, It could cause some critical well-being issues. Overexposure to electronic devices can cause eyesight problems like near-sightedness, astigmatism, and more. People will also suffer from mental diseases, for instance, insomnia. Besides, this convenience can disrupt the work-life balance. Some people may spend their whole time at home to finish what they are supposed to do at work. It can be considered productive to some workers but can be overwhelming to others.
For all the aforementioned aspects, this development could bring both advantages and disadvantages. Always using smart devices is harmful so there should be a way people balance their online work with daily lives.
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by government rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 11
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think the newly built houses should be as same as the old house style in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build house in their own style Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- People think that in the near future cars will be driven by computers not by people Why Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 225.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52888888889 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03889518586 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662222222222 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.7800868358 49.4020404114 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.1764705882 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2352941176 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187373825134 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568536949033 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402474382217 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109645419906 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279304748621 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.